Home / Answers / AI governance
AI governanceAnswersCISSP · 22 years

Has the EU AI Act high-risk deadline been delayed? What applies now?

As of 1 October 2026 · this page tracks a moving rule
Short answer

Yes, but only the high-risk obligations. The Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force since 27 July 2026, moved stand-alone (Annex III) high-risk obligations to 2 December 2027 and product-embedded (Annex I) ones to 2 August 2028. Prohibitions, AI literacy, general-purpose AI rules and Article 50 transparency duties are already in force.

The change

Deferred, not cancelled

The Omnibus was agreed in trilogue in May 2026, adopted on 8 July and published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026. It moves the dates; it does not remove the high-risk obligations or reduce what they will require. Risk management, data governance, technical documentation, human oversight and conformity assessment all still arrive, just later.

The practical risk is reading "delayed" as "later problem". High-risk compliance means evidence produced over time, such as logs, test results and oversight records, which cannot be created the month before the deadline.

At a glance

Key facts

DateWhat applies
2 Feb 2025Prohibited practices (Art. 5); AI literacy (Art. 4)
2 Aug 2025General-purpose AI model obligations
2 Aug 2026Transparency obligations (Art. 50)
2 Dec 2026End of Art. 50(2) marking grace period for systems already on the market
2 Dec 2027High-risk: stand-alone systems (Annex III)
2 Aug 2028High-risk: AI in regulated products (Annex I)
Already live

What is in force today

Since 2 February 2025: the Article 5 prohibitions, and the Article 4 AI literacy duty. The Omnibus kept AI literacy as an obligation on providers and deployers but softened it to taking measures to support their staff's literacy.

Since 2 August 2025: obligations on providers of general-purpose AI models.

Since 2 August 2026: Article 50 transparency. People must be told when they are interacting with an AI system; deepfakes and certain AI-generated text must be disclosed. Generative systems already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 for the machine-readable marking requirement in Article 50(2).

Fines

What non-compliance costs

Under Article 99: up to €35m or 7% of worldwide turnover for prohibited practices; up to €15m or 3% for most other breaches, including transparency; up to €7.5m or 1% for supplying incorrect information to authorities. For SMEs, the lower of the two amounts applies.

In the boardroom

Questions a director should ask

  1. Do we have an inventory of every AI system we provide or deploy in the EU, classified by risk tier?
  2. Which of our customer-facing systems are caught by Article 50 today, and are they compliant?
  3. What evidence will a high-risk system need by December 2027, and when do we have to start producing it?
  4. What have we done to support AI literacy for staff who use or oversee AI?
Sources
Related answers
AI governanceDoes ISO/IEC 42001 certification mean EU AI Act compliance?AI governanceHow should a board govern agentic AI?India DPDPDoes India's DPDP Act apply to foreign companies and GCCs in India?
Contact

Need this answered for your board?

Board reporting, AI governance, DPDP readiness or CMMC. Tell me which and what the constraint is.

me@sarfarazchougule.com →